His version of the social contract states that before the social contract, life in the state of nature was happy and there was equality amongst men.(Laskar;2013). In stark contrast, social contract theorists assert that no morality exists independent of that which is constructed by people (although they offer differing accounts of natural rights). Variations of social contract theory promoted by other philosophers such as Rawls, Rousseau, and Locke address some of these problems. Hobbes argues that in a state of nature there are no morals meaning individuals can do whatever they want. The government is not accountable to the people in the same way that the people are accountable to the government. Web. Papers provided by EduBirdie writers usually outdo students' samples. In return, the State promises to exercise its absolute power to maintain a state of peace (by punishing deviants, etc. He has written in literary journals such as Read Herrings and provides written online guides for towns ranging from Seymour, Connecticut to Haines, Alaska. One observes that Enlightenment philosophers operated on the notion that the existing social and political orders could not withstand critical scrutiny and were rooted in religious myth and mystery and founded on vague cultures. One of the greatest strengths of the social contract theory is that it acknowledges the need for consent from the population before a government can attain legitimacy. No room for dissent: Critics argue that Social Contract Theory does not leave room for dissent. The social contract means that the state should guarantee that all men have control over their own lives so that their natural rights are not violated. Hobbes believed in something called State of Nature which is the condition of human beings without political association. A person joins this social group and enters into the social contract freely. 15 11 2016. They argue that this can lead to a society that is individualistic and selfish. Expert Answer. In this article, we will take a cheerful analysis of the pros and cons of Social Contract Theory.var cid='7881753709';var pid='ca-pub-7143940720449858';var slotId='div-gpt-ad-ablison_com-medrectangle-3-0';var ffid=2;var alS=2021%1000;var container=document.getElementById(slotId);container.style.width='100%';var ins=document.createElement('ins');ins.id=slotId+'-asloaded';ins.className='adsbygoogle ezasloaded';ins.dataset.adClient=pid;ins.dataset.adChannel=cid;if(ffid==2){ins.dataset.fullWidthResponsive='true';} In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck two men are searching for jobs during the Great Depression. (22) If psychological egoism is a tautology and reduces all actions to selfishness, we should eliminate the theory as meaningless, and accept that there is a substantive difference between selfish and selfless actions. The natural condition of mankind is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit. Essentially the idea is that citizens will give up some of their freedoms to the government in return for protection of their remaining rights. There is always a solution to every problem with this problem the solution is to go to war then see the fear of the society and their insecurities of that war, then the government using their reason to discover ways out of the conflict thus ending the war. Hobbes explained, And therefore, they that are subjects to a Monarch, cannot without his leave cast off Monarchy, and return to the confusion of a disunited Multitude; not tranferre their Person from him that beareth it (Hobbes in Perry, 22). iW@J]( 6N|q__KUVd-IDsGE+q