manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods. Under certain circumstances consent is not required as long as information is anonymized and the submission does not include images that may identify the person. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. I am anxious as I heard that usually the editor just needs 1 week to decide if a paper deservesto be sent for peer review or not. Reviewer selection is critical to the review process, and we work hard to ensure that the different technical and conceptual aspects of the work are covered. The portal also provides authors links so that they can quickly register a new resource and obtain an RRID. For large-sized journals the figures should be 84 mm (for double-column text areas), or 174 mm (for single-column text areas) wide and not higher than 234 mm. Please see the various examples of wording below and revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs. Each figure should have a concise caption describing accurately what the figure depicts. Figure parts should be denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.). Or did the editor make his/her final decision but simply was too lazy to write a reply? On occasion, particularly if the editors feel that additional technical expertise is needed to make a decision, they may obtain advice from additional reviewers. What does the status "Under review" mean for the journal Clinical Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors; managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication;*. But what I don't understand is the difference between editorial decision started and manuscipt under consideration. [CDATA[> Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. Please do not suggest anyone who may have a conflict of interest in reviewing your manuscript, such as former advisors, students, or recent collaborators. Authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors at submission. wormified 4 yr. ago. The article will be published online after receipt of the corrected proofs. sciencenature - List at the end of the paper in consecutive order. Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship, are not allowed without the approval of the Editor. The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.. You will need to log in; if you do not have an account, you will be able to register for one when you submit. If a study was granted exemption or did not require ethics approval, this should also be detailed in the manuscript. Further information is available from the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC). All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. Reasons for these changes in authorship should be explained. Primary research articles require a disclosure statement. We consulted extensively with the IRB of XYZ who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. Keep lettering consistently sized throughout your final-sized artwork, usually about 23 mm (812 pt). Nature Communications 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling (self-plagiarism). Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journals and/or Publishers implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article, - an expression of concern may be placed with the article. The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. Dataset identifiers including DOIs should be expressed as full URLs. These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and . On day 4 they told the corresponding author that a subject editor had been assigned to handle my manuscript. on 17 Jun, 2022, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Authors should treat all communication with the Journal as confidential which includes correspondence with direct representatives from the Journal such as Editors-in-Chief and/or Handling Editors and reviewers reports unless explicit consent has been received to share information. The journal also requires that authors cite any publicly available data on which the conclusions of the paper rely. The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. Authors should be aware to secure informed consent from the individual (or parent or guardian if the participant is a minor or incapable) See also section on Informed Consent. All figures are to be numbered using Arabic numerals. Provide titles for all tables. Short communications should begin with a short abstract of up to 100 words. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. So did you get an answer? In addition, they should exclude themselves from handling manuscripts in cases where there is a competing interest. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. Author A.B. Springer Nature. Indicate what graphics program was used to create the artwork. For life science journals only (when applicable). Book reference: 3. *All of the above are guidelines and authors need to make sure to respect third parties rights such as copyright and/or moral rights. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. You must have received the manuscript ID by now. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. Accessed December 31, 2006. If you are unsure whether your paper is in scope for Nature Biotechnology, you can submit a presubmission enquiry, providing an abstract of your work.You can do this in our online Manuscript . Springer Nature Author Services , , , , . Hope this helps. The editors of the receiving journal will take the reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases they may choose to take advice from additional reviewers. 3. Manuscript Nature switched from ''Review completed'' to ''manuscript under consideration'' Dear, As a co-author, i saw recently that our paper switched from status. Dear Colleagues, Biomolecules invites submissions to a Special Issue focused on the chemistry, biology, and medical application of natural peptides and their mimetics in recognition of Nature's remarkable inspiration for gaining new ideas for future medicine. The BioBank protocols are in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology welcomes original investigations, short communications and review articles. All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate). To ensure objectivity and transparency in research and to ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed, authors should include information regarding sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases. Examples of statements to be used when funding has been received: Examples of statements to be used when there is no funding: Examples of statements to be used when there are interests to declare: Non-financial interests: Author C is an unpaid member of committee Z. The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. Internet Explorer). We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? RRIDs are provided by the Resource Identification Portal. Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article Sample statements if identifying information about participants is available in the article: Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article. After online publication, further changes can only be made in the form of an Erratum, which will be hyperlinked to the article. Offprints can be ordered by the corresponding author. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. No punctuation is to be included after the number, nor is any punctuation to be placed at the end of the caption. Once typesetting is complete, you will receive a link asking you to confirm your affiliation, choose the publishing model for your article as well as arrange rights and payment of any associated publication cost. Do not number the appendix figures, "A1, A2, A3, etc." Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. Sample statements for "Consent to participate": Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Science Advances. I was expecting it to be that fast to be honest (7 days of median, average from submission to editorial decision). The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the Editor's discretion. publications - What proportion of papers submitted to Nature are Nature Neuroscience manuscript stage : r/labrats - Reddit has received research support from Company A., The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.. For example www.clinicaltrials.gov or any of the primary registries that participate in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Approval of the change during revision is at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. Can you put your timelines? Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Ethics approval. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". Detailed descriptions of individual participants, whether of their whole bodies or of body sections, may lead to disclosure of their identity. Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc. Incomplete or incorrect information is also likely to result in your paper being rejected. The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. Additional Information for After Acceptance, Research Data Policy and Data Availability Statements, Research involving human participants, their data or biological material, Mistakes to avoid during manuscript preparation, data repositories that can assist with this, International Cell Line Authentication Committee, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. When submitting your manuscript, please read the following guidelines, which will help you through the submission and publication process. The editor contacts the author with the decision. Once you have completed this, your article will be processed and you will receive the proofs. Authors may request that their paper be reinstated one more time under a new DOI. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses, Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systems. Please note that journals may have individual policies on (sharing) research data in concordance with disciplinary norms and expectations. Individual participants in studies have, for example, the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered, to what they have said during a study or an interview, as well as to any photograph that was taken. This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of D (Ethics approval number: ). minors, patients, refugees, etc) or the use of images in sensitive contexts. Examples of statements to be used when no ethical approval is required/exemption granted: This is an observational study. Manuscript Nature switched from ''Review completed'' to - Reddit In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images. Identify previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference citation at the end of the figure caption. This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.