More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . Hello. Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript, HANDBOOK: A practical handbook of templates for communicating with the journal. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. If the Editor in Chief decides the paper is within the Journal's scope. on 25 Jun, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. For translations into other languages, we recommend using YouTube's translation feature. Privacy Policy. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. After providing a brief account of the nature of agency-based reasons, we argue that there is good reason to think that these reasons apply to at least chimpanzees. Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Reviewer comment: In your analysis of the data you have chosen to use a somewhat obscure fitting function (regression). Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. [CDATA[> For more information, please see our The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. Did you find it helpful? After the paper passes the quality check, it is assigned to a Science Editor. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Clearly show the major revisions in the text, either with a different color text, by highlighting the changes, or with Microsoft Words Track Changes feature. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. If you are unable to access the site, please contact the journal editorial office at Not sure what the right forum is for this. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that its a Nature journal, thats unlikely. Technical reasons for rejection include: These rejection reasons can be avoided by investing enough time in reading around the subject area, carefully deciding on the topic to focus on, the hypothesis and planning a comprehensive experiment as outlined in the Springer Nature Journal Tutorial: Writing a Journal Manuscript. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Resubmitted manuscript received. Under these circumstances, the editors letter will state explicitly whether or not a resubmitted version would be considered. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of . When challenging the decision you may receive a letter from the editor explaining . Editors can track the transfer offer under 'Submissions with Decision' section of the main menu or via Search Submissions. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. The criteria for a paper to be sent for peer-review are that the results seem novel, arresting (illuminating, unexpected or surprising), and that the work described has both immediate and far-reaching implications. ago. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? and JavaScript. There may be cases when you want to submit to another journal prior to receiving a decision. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. A decision to send the paper for review can take longer, but usually within a month (in which case the editors send apologies). Then this decision is emailed to the author by the editor in chief. Reviewers are expected to treat the manuscript confidentially. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. [CDATA[> The author is provided with a due date for submission of a revised paper. You will need to go through the through the decision letter to see what the journal has said about the manuscript. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. The editor contacts the author with the decision. Provide any evidence to support your opinion when you believe a reviewer has made technical errors in their assessment of your manuscript or has been biased. To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. Many papers are published online ahead of print publication date: corresponding authors of these papers will be informed by e-mail when the online publication date is confirmed, one week ahead of publication. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. GSA Bulletin: https://gsabulletin.msubmit.net Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. ISSN 2055-0278 (online), Cancel This letter usually contains information on how to return your revised manuscript including instructions on how to highlight the changes made and when you need to return the revised version. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. [CDATA[// > However, on occasion editors might consult with expert researchers when deciding whether to review a paper. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. [CDATA[> Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. This enables most queries to be resolved before proof stage. Finding reviewers who agree to deal with the paper - another week. TIP: Do not make appeals personal attacks on the Editors or reviewers. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. If the authors feel that they have a strong scientific case for reconsideration (if the referees have missed the point of the paper, for example) they can appeal the decision in writing. Popular answers (1) In my experience you can challenge an editor's decision when the review is clearly biased. So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. We welcome people and content from all related fields. Yes Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. What are the basic rules for submitting the same research to a conference and a journal? As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. . The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. Please note, this decision must be made at the time of initial submission and cannot be changed later. The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. That being said, they've probably done an initial review and didn't flat out reject it, so that is a good thing! The author is being contacted about the Editor-in-Chief's decision. on 14 Jul, 2020, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. ]]> How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Geosphere: geosphere@geosociety.org. This decision is the sole responsibility of the journal editor. ensure that the terminology and notation conform to. Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. naturescienceBoard of Reviewing Editors . We understand that you have not received any journal email. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. ensure that the figures and tables are clear and will fit in the space available. Until then, you may find it worthwhile to go through the following resources about journal statuses: Answered by Irfan Syed [CDATA[> The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. After all revisions have been made (papers may be returned to the author more than once for revision), if the paper is found suitable for publication in a GSA journal, the Science Editor will send a final decision letter to the author, accepting the manuscript for publication. Incomplete data. //-->